Research results internet dating Top amatuer chat sites
It's not that familiarity always breeds contempt, the researchers say.
But on average, as you learn more about any lover, the less likely it is that you will click and get along with them, Norton explained.
They end up being disappointed again.”Little white lies add to the inflated expectations.
“One of the reasons people are so optimistic when they read these things is because everybody kind of shades their profile a little bit more positive then maybe it should be,” Norton said.
In one study, Frost, the MIT researcher, designed an online interface in which people meet for “virtual dates.” For instance, you and a prospective date would each play an avatar and wander through an art gallery together.
Profiles were corroborated with real-life measurements of a sample of users.About half of the men lied about their height, adding at least a half inch to their stature, while more than 60 percent of all participants skewed their weight by five pounds or more.Match tips Norton and his colleagues are developing ways for online daters to stay grounded in reality as they navigate the virtual world of romance.The first trait had a negative amplifying effect, the scientists found.
If subjects said the first trait failed to describe them, they were more likely to say the same of subsequent traits presented to them.“Don’t assume that because you log onto a Web site and there are all these options that it’s going to be any easier.”The Rules of Attraction in the Game of Love Love is More Powerful than Sex Men and Women Really Do Think Differently Loss of Loved One Really Can Cause Broken Heart Altruistic Love Related to Happier Marriages Why Some Old Lovers Look Alike When a Woman Smells Best The Sexy, Healthy Scent of a Man Gay Men Respond Differently to Pheromones Attractive Virtual Professors Draw Student Attention Creative Types Have More Sex Partners Sex in High School Involves Long Chains of Relations Oral Sex Common, Less Risky, Teens Say Fact or Fiction?